MOFA-COSMOS pipeline
Installation and dependency
In this tutorial, we use the new Meta-Footprint Analysis MOON to score a mechanistic network.
#install cosmosR from github directly to obtain the newest version
if (!requireNamespace("devtools", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("devtools")
if (!requireNamespace("cosmosR", quietly = TRUE)) devtools::install_github("saezlab/cosmosR")DecoupleR is used to score various regulatory interactions.
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("BiocManager")
if (!requireNamespace("decoupleR", quietly = TRUE)) BiocManager::install("saezlab/decoupleR")We are using the LIANA package to process the LR interactions.
if (!requireNamespace("remotes", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("remotes")
if (!requireNamespace("liana", quietly = TRUE)) remotes::install_github('saezlab/liana')We are using MOFA2 (Argelaguet et al., 2018) to find decompose variance across different omics and use COSMOS to find mechanistic interpretations of its factors. However, since we are using the python version of MOFA2, please make sure to have mofapy2 as well as panda and numpy installed in your (conda) environment (e.g. by using reticulate: reticulate::use_condaenv(“base”, required = T) %>% reticulate::conda_install(c(“mofapy2”,“panda”,“numpy”)). For downstream analysis, the R version of MOFA2 is used.
# Install MOFA2 from bioconductor (stable version)
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("BiocManager")
if (!requireNamespace("MOFA2", quietly = TRUE)) BiocManager::install("MOFA2")General information (tutorials) on how to use COSMOS and MOFA2, see COSMOS and MOFA2.
For data manipulation, visualization, etc. further packages are needed which are loaded here along with MOFA2 and COSMOS.
#imports
library(readr)
#core methods
library(cosmosR)
library(MOFA2)
library(liana)
library(decoupleR)
#data manipulations
library(dplyr)
library(reshape2)
library(GSEABase)
library(tidyr)
#plotting
library(ggplot2)
library(ggfortify)
library(pheatmap)
library(gridExtra)
library(RColorBrewer)
# library(RCy3)From omics data to MOFA ready input
Since extensive pre-processing is beyond the scope of this tutorial, here only the transformation of pre-processed single omics data to a long data.frame (columns: “sample”, “group”, “feature”, “view”, “value”) is shown. For more details and information regarding appropriate input, please refer to the MOFA tutorial MOFA2: training a model in R. The raw data is accessed through NCI60 cellminer and the scripts for pre-processing can be found in the associated folder.
Here, we have the following views (with samples as columns and genes as rows): transcriptomics (RNA-seq PMID:31113817), proteomics (SWATH (Mass spectrometry) PMID:31733513} and metabolomics (LC/MS & GC/MS (Mass spectrometry) DTP NCI60 data). The group information is stored inside the RNA metadata and based on transcription factor clustering (see scripts/RNA/Analyze_RNA.R). Further, only samples are kept for which each omic is available (however this is not necessary since MOFA2 is able to impute data).
# Transcriptomics
## Load data
RNA <- as.data.frame(read_csv("data/RNA/RNA_log2_FPKM_clean.csv"))
rownames(RNA) <- RNA[,1]
RNA <- RNA[,-1]
## Remove genes with excessive amount of NAs (only keep genes with max. amount
#of NAs = 33.3 % across cell lines)
RNA <- RNA[rowSums(is.na(RNA))<(dim(RNA)[2]/3),]
## Only keep highly variable genes (as suggested by MOFA): here top ≈70% genes
#to keep >75% of TFs (103 out of 133). For stronger selection, we can further
#reduce the number of genes (e.g. top 50%)
RNA_sd <- sort(apply(RNA, 1, function(x) sd(x,na.rm = T)), decreasing = T)
hist(RNA_sd, breaks = 100)
hist(RNA_sd[1:6000], breaks = 100)
RNA_sd <- RNA_sd[1:6000]
RNA <- RNA[names(RNA_sd),]
# Proteomics
## Load data
proteo <- as.data.frame(read_csv("data/proteomic/Prot_log10_SWATH_clean.csv"))
rownames(proteo) <- proteo[,1]
proteo <- proteo[,-1]
## Only keep highly variable proteins (as suggested by MOFA): here top ≈60%.
#For stronger selection, we can further reduce the number of proteins (e.g. only keep top 50%)
proteo_sd <- sort(apply(proteo, 1, function(x) sd(x,na.rm = T)), decreasing = T)
hist(proteo_sd, breaks = 100)
hist(proteo_sd[1:round(dim(proteo)[1]*⅗)], breaks = 100)
proteo_sd <- proteo_sd[1:round(dim(proteo)[1]*⅗)]
proteo <- proteo[names(proteo_sd),]
# Metabolomics
## Load data
metab <- as.data.frame(read_csv("data/metabolomic/metabolomic_clean_vsn.csv"))
rownames(metab) <- metab[,1]
metab <- metab[,-1]
## Since we have only a limited number of metabolite measurements,
#all measurements are kept here
metab_sd <- apply(metab, 1, function(x) sd(x,na.rm=T))
hist(metab_sd, breaks = 100)
# Create long data frame
## Only keep samples with each view present
overlap_patients <- intersect(intersect(names(RNA),names(proteo)),names(metab))
RNA <- RNA[,overlap_patients]
proteo <- proteo[,overlap_patients]
metab <- metab[,overlap_patients]
## Create columns required for MOFA
### RNA
RNA <- melt(as.data.frame(cbind(RNA,row.names(RNA))))
RNA$view <- "RNA"
RNA <- RNA[,c(2,1,4,3)]
names(RNA) <- c("sample","feature","view","value")
### Proteomics
proteo <- melt(as.data.frame(cbind(proteo,row.names(proteo))))
proteo$view <- "proteo"
proteo <- proteo[,c(2,1,4,3)]
names(proteo) <- c("sample","feature","view","value")
### Metabolomics
metab <- melt(as.data.frame(cbind(metab,row.names(metab))))
metab$view <- "metab"
metab <- metab[,c(2,1,4,3)]
names(metab) <- c("sample","feature","view","value")
## Merge long data frame to one
mofa_ready_data <- as.data.frame(do.call(rbind,list(RNA,proteo,metab)))
# Save MOFA metadata information and MOFA input
write_csv(mofa_ready_data, file = "data/mofa/mofa_data.csv")The final data frame has the following structure:
head(mofa_ready_data)
## sample feature view value
## 1 786-0 KRT8 RNA 7.261
## 2 786-0 FN1 RNA 7.823
## 3 786-0 S100A4 RNA NA
## 4 786-0 RNA5-8S5 RNA 11.045
## 5 786-0 MT1E RNA 7.010
## 6 786-0 VIM RNA 9.366We have successfully combined single omic data sets to a long multi-omics data frame that can be used as a MOFA input.
In this part we assess the correlation between the RNA and proteomic data. We both look for correlation across samples AND across features. When we check across sample, we interrogate the correlation at the level of single genes, that is for given gene, how is a change is transcript abundance is reflected in the the level of its protein. This correlation can be different between genes, as there are all subject to different regulatory mechanisms. when we check across features, we interrogate the correlation at the level of single samples. that is, we check if overall the protein abundance are good proxy of transcript abundance, and vice-versa. The imperfect correlation between trnaxcripts and proteins reflects the complexity of the translation process, as well as protein and RNA stability.
condition_prot_RNA_correlation <- sapply(unique(mofa_ready_data$sample), function(condition){
merged_data <- merge(mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$sample == condition & mofa_ready_data$view == "RNA"),-c(1,3)],
mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$sample == condition & mofa_ready_data$view == "proteo"),-c(1,3)],
by = "feature")
return(cor(merged_data[,2],merged_data[,3], use = "pairwise.complete.obs"))
})
hist(condition_prot_RNA_correlation, breaks = 20)
overlap_genes <- unique(intersect(proteo$feature,RNA$feature))
single_prot_RNA_correlation <- sapply(overlap_genes, function(gene){
merged_data <- merge(mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$feature == gene & mofa_ready_data$view == "RNA"),-c(2,3)],
mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$feature == gene & mofa_ready_data$view == "proteo"),-c(2,3)],
by = "sample")
return(cor(merged_data[,2],merged_data[,3], use = "pairwise.complete.obs"))
})
hist(single_prot_RNA_correlation, breaks = 100)
MOFA run
After pre-processing the data into MOFA appropriate input, let’s perform the MOFA analysis. To change specific MOFA options the function write_MOFA_options_file is used. For more information regarding option setting see MOFA option tutorial. Since we don’t know how many factors are needed to explain our data well, various maximum numbers of factors are tested. The final results can be found in the results/mofa/ folder.
Only run this chunk if you want to re-perform the mofa optimisation. The results are already available in the results/mofa folder. We are testing various amount of maximum number of factors that MOFA is allowed to explore.
You need to instal mofapy2 in python3 to run this chunk. On windows, you can simply run “python3” the terminal to make sure its installed or be automatically redirected to the windows store page if it’s not. Then, you can run “python3 -m pip install –user mofapy2” in a terminal to install the module to python3.
for(i in c(5:15,20,length(unique(mofa_ready_data$sample)))){
wd <- getwd()
write_MOFA_options_file(input_file = '/data/mofa/mofa_data.csv', output_file = paste0('/results/mofa/mofa_res_',i,'factor.hdf5'), factors = i, convergence_mode = "slow", likelihoods = c('gaussian','gaussian','gaussian'))
system(paste0(paste('python3', wd, sep = " "), paste('/scripts/mofa/mofa2.py', "options_MOFA.csv")))
}Investigate MOFA output
We first load the different MOFA models containing the MOFA results together with the metadata information. Since we don’t know a-priori which is the ideal number of factors, we can settle on the highest number of factor where the model stabilises.
# Load MOFA output
for(i in c(5:15,20,length(unique(mofa_ready_data$sample)))){
filepath <- paste0('results/mofa/mofa_res_',i,'factor.hdf5')
model <- load_model(filepath)
meta_data <- read_csv("data/metadata/RNA_metadata_cluster.csv")[,c(1,2)]
colnames(meta_data) <- c("sample","cluster")
mofa_metadata <- merge(samples_metadata(model), meta_data, by = "sample")
names(mofa_metadata) <- c("sample","group","cluster")
samples_metadata(model) <- mofa_metadata
assign(paste0("model",i),model)
}Then, we can compare the factors from different MOFA models and check on consistency (here: model 7-13).
compare_factors(list(model7,model8,model9,model10,model11,model12,model13), cluster_rows = F, cluster_cols = F,)
Here, we can see that the inferred MOFA factor weights do not change drastically around 9. For the sake of this tutorial, we choose the 9-factor MOFA model.
model <- model10The next part deals with the analysis and interpretation of the MOFA factors with specific focus on the factor weights. The classic tutorial on how to perform downstream analysis after MOFA model training can be found here MOFA+: downstream analysis (in R). In this context, it is important to emphasize that the factors can be interpreted similarly to principal components (PCs) in a principal component analysis (PCA).
An initial metric we can explore is the total variance (R2) explained per view by our MOFA model. This helps us understand how well the model represents the data.
# Investigate factors: Explained total variance per view
plot_variance_explained(model, x="group", y="factor", plot_total = T)[[2]]
calculate_variance_explained(model)
## $r2_total
## $single_group
## RNA metab proteo
## 59.59992 18.70369 23.29474
##
## attr(,"class")
## [1] "relistable" "list"
##
## $r2_per_factor
## $single_group
## RNA metab proteo
## Factor1 24.0201682 0.002979224 0.214741826
## Factor2 4.4849965 14.093737072 2.236180823
## Factor3 0.2777266 2.193923605 12.875906515
## Factor4 7.3683342 2.461682919 4.752507250
## Factor5 13.2330359 0.008854678 0.004884149
## Factor6 2.3102555 0.001537887 2.692284962
## Factor7 4.5839551 0.007795120 0.390045680
## Factor8 2.8171650 0.277818450 0.210418704
## Factor9 1.9469859 0.004198608 0.003992617
##
## attr(,"class")
## [1] "relistable" "list"The bar plot demonstrates that the nine factors for the view RNA explain more than 50% of the variance. In contrast, for both metabolomics as well as proteomics around 20% of the variance can be explained by all factors.
It isn’t unexpected that more variance of the RNA dataset can be reconstructed. Usually, more features available in a given view will lead to a higher % of variance explained. It is interesting to notice though that similar amount of variance are explained for metabolic and proteomic views, despite having very different number of features. This may be due to the fact that metabolite abundances are in general more cross-correlated than protein abundances (due to the underlying regulatory structures, e.i. reaction networks vs protein synthesis and degratation regulatory mechanisms).
#Get the cross correlation for RNA and proteomic data
RNA <- dcast(mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$view == "RNA"),-3], feature~sample, value.var = "value")
row.names(RNA) <- RNA[,1]
RNA <- RNA[,-1]
RNA_crosscor <- cor(t(RNA), use = "pairwise.complete.obs")
# hist(RNA_crosscor[upper.tri(RNA_crosscor)], breaks = 1000)
prot <- dcast(mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$view == "proteo"),-3], feature~sample, value.var = "value")
row.names(prot) <- prot[,1]
prot <- prot[,-1]
prot_crosscor <- cor(t(prot), use = "pairwise.complete.obs")
# hist(prot_crosscor[upper.tri(prot_crosscor)], breaks = 1000)
metabo <- dcast(mofa_ready_data[which(mofa_ready_data$view == "metab"),-3], feature~sample, value.var = "value")
row.names(metabo) <- metabo[,1]
metabo <- metabo[,-1]
metabo_crosscor <- cor(t(metabo), use = "pairwise.complete.obs")
# hist(metabo_crosscor[upper.tri(metabo_crosscor)], breaks = 1000)
# plot(calculate_variance_explained(model)$r2_total$single_group, c(mean(RNA_crosscor),mean(metabo_crosscor),mean(prot_crosscor)))
plot(calculate_variance_explained(model)$r2_total$single_group, c(dim(RNA_crosscor)[1],dim(metabo_crosscor)[1],dim(prot_crosscor)[1]))
df_variance_crosscor <- as.data.frame(cbind(calculate_variance_explained(model)$r2_total$single_group,
c(mean(RNA_crosscor),mean(metabo_crosscor),mean(prot_crosscor)),
c(dim(RNA_crosscor)[1],dim(metabo_crosscor)[1],dim(prot_crosscor)[1])))
names(df_variance_crosscor) <- c("var_expl","mean_crosscor","n_features")
df_variance_crosscor$prod <- sqrt(df_variance_crosscor$mean_crosscor) * df_variance_crosscor$n_features
#Just plot them as scatter plot with regression lines
mofa_solved <- ggplot(df_variance_crosscor, aes(x = prod, y = var_expl)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method='lm', formula= y~x) +
theme_minimal() +
xlab("sqrt(mean cross-corelation of view) * number of features") +
ylab("variance explained for each view") +
ggtitle("MOFA size and cross cor influence")
mofa_solved
mofa_nfeatures <- ggplot(df_variance_crosscor, aes(x = n_features, y = var_expl)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method='lm', formula= y~x) +
theme_minimal() +
xlab("sqrt(mean cross-corelation of view) * number of features") +
ylab("variance explained for each view") +
ggtitle("MOFA size influence")
mofa_nfeatures
#Get the actual coeficient signficance
summary(lm(data= df_variance_crosscor, var_expl~prod))
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = var_expl ~ prod, data = df_variance_crosscor)
##
## Residuals:
## RNA metab proteo
## -0.06207 -0.77553 0.83760
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 1.885e+01 8.542e-01 22.06 0.0288 *
## prod 1.434e-02 5.176e-04 27.70 0.0230 *
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
##
## Residual standard error: 1.143 on 1 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.9987, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9974
## F-statistic: 767.1 on 1 and 1 DF, p-value: 0.02297
summary(lm(data= df_variance_crosscor, var_expl~n_features))
##
## Call:
## lm(formula = var_expl ~ n_features, data = df_variance_crosscor)
##
## Residuals:
## RNA metab proteo
## 1.480 3.426 -4.905
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
## (Intercept) 14.366419 5.255059 2.734 0.223
## n_features 0.007292 0.001446 5.043 0.125
##
## Residual standard error: 6.163 on 1 degrees of freedom
## Multiple R-squared: 0.9622, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9243
## F-statistic: 25.43 on 1 and 1 DF, p-value: 0.1246Since we would like to use the found correlation for downstream COSMOS analysis, we first investigate the variance (R2) each factor can explain per view as well as investigate the factor explaining the most variance across all views.
# Investigate factors: Explained variance per view for each factor
pheatmap(model@cache$variance_explained$r2_per_factor[[1]], display_numbers = T, angle_col = "0", legend_labels = c("0","10", "20", "30", "40", "Variance\n\n"), legend = T, main = "", legend_breaks = c(0,10, 20, 30, 40, max(model@cache$variance_explained$r2_per_factor[[1]])), cluster_rows = F, cluster_cols = F, color = colorRampPalette(c("white","red"))(100), fontsize_number = 10)
pheatmap(model@cache$variance_explained$r2_per_factor[[1]], display_numbers = T, angle_col = "0", legend_labels = c("0","10", "20", "30", "40", "Variance\n\n"), legend = T, main = "", legend_breaks = c(0,10, 20, 30, 40, max(model@cache$variance_explained$r2_per_factor[[1]])), cluster_rows = F, cluster_cols = F, color = colorRampPalette(c("white","red"))(100), fontsize_number = 10,filename = "results/mofa/variance_heatmap.pdf",width = 4, height = 2.5)By analyzing this heatmap, we can observe that Factor 1 and 5 explain a large proportion of variance of the RNA, Factor 2 and 4 mainly explains the variance of the metabolomics and Factor 3 highlights variability from the proteomics view. Consequently, no factor explains a large portion of the variance across all views, but factor 2 and 4 capture variance across all views. We can also analyze the correlation between factors. The next plot highlights the spearman correlation between each factor.
# Investigate factors: Correlation between factors
pdf(file="results/mofa/plot_factor_cor.pdf", height = 5, width = 5)
plot_factor_cor(model, type = 'upper', method = "spearman", addCoef.col = "black")Next, we can characterize the factors with the available metadata of samples. Indeed, it can be interesting to see if some factors are associated with metadata classes, as they can help to guide our intepretation of the factors. This part rely on an interpretation of the Z matrix of the mofa model, while ignoring the factor weight themselves. The factor weights will be analysed subsequently.
To begin simply, we can check if some tissue of origin are associated with any of the factors. There are different ways thsi can be done, but we find that using a simple linear association between a given tissues category in a factor compared to any other tissue categories (e.g. breast tissue vs every other tissue types) provide an easy to interpret insight that serves our purpose well. To do so, we use the Univariate Linear Model (ULM) function of decoupleR.
NCI_60_metadata <- as.data.frame(read_csv(file = "data/metadata/RNA_metadata_cluster.csv"))
## Rows: 60 Columns: 16
## ── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## Delimiter: ","
## chr (12): cell_line, tissue of origin a, sex a, prior treatment a,b, Epithel...
## dbl (4): cluster, age a, mdr f, doubling time g
##
## ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
#discretize age category so that regression can be applied
NCI_60_metadata$`age over 50` <- NCI_60_metadata$`age a` > 50
tissues <-NCI_60_metadata[,c(3,1)]
names(tissues) <- c("source","target")
Z_matrix <- as.data.frame(model@expectations$Z$single_group)
#Check specifically tissue meta-data association with Z matrix
tissue_enrichment <- decoupleR::run_ulm(Z_matrix, tissues)
tissue_enrichment <- reshape2::dcast(tissue_enrichment, source~condition, value.var = "score")
row.names(tissue_enrichment) <- tissue_enrichment$source
tissue_enrichment <- tissue_enrichment[,-1]
#plot them as heatmaps
palette <- make_heatmap_color_palette(tissue_enrichment)
pheatmap(t(tissue_enrichment), show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315,display_numbers = F, filename = "results/mofa/mofa_tissue_enrichment.pdf", width = 3, height = 2.6)
pheatmap(tissue_enrichment, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315,display_numbers = T)Here, we can see that factor 4 seems to be strongly associated with eukemia, and factor 2 with melanoma.
#format meta-data names
all_metadata <- reshape2::melt(NCI_60_metadata[,c(1,3,17,5,7,8,10,13,14)], id.vars = "cell_line")
all_metadata$variable <- gsub(" a$","",all_metadata$variable)
all_metadata$variable <- gsub(" a,c$","",all_metadata$variable)
all_metadata$variable <- gsub(" d$","",all_metadata$variable)
all_metadata$variable <- gsub("histology","histo",all_metadata$variable)
all_metadata$variable <- gsub("tissue of origin","tissue",all_metadata$variable)
all_metadata$value <- gsub("[(]81-103[)]","",all_metadata$value)
all_metadata$value <- gsub("[(]35-57[)]","",all_metadata$value)
all_metadata$value <- gsub("Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center","Memorial SKCC",all_metadata$value)
all_metadata$value <- gsub("Malignant melanotic melanoma","Malig. melanotic melan.",all_metadata$value)
all_metadata$value <- gsub("Ductal carcinoma-mammary gland","Duct. carci-mam. gland",all_metadata$value)
all_metadata$target <- paste(all_metadata$variable, all_metadata$value, sep = ": ")
all_metadata <- all_metadata[,c(4,1)]
names(all_metadata) <- c("source","target")
Z_matrix <- as.data.frame(model@expectations$Z$single_group)
#run ULM on the Z matrix meta data to find associated metadata features
all_metadata_enrichment <- decoupleR::run_ulm(Z_matrix, all_metadata, minsize = 3)
all_metadata_enrichment <- reshape2::dcast(all_metadata_enrichment, source~condition, value.var = "score")
row.names(all_metadata_enrichment) <- all_metadata_enrichment$source
all_metadata_enrichment <- all_metadata_enrichment[,-1]
all_metadata_enrichment_top <- all_metadata_enrichment[
apply(all_metadata_enrichment, 1, function(x){max(abs(x)) > 2}),
]
#Plot the heatmap
palette <- make_heatmap_color_palette(all_metadata_enrichment_top)
pheatmap(t(all_metadata_enrichment_top), show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315,display_numbers = F, filename = "results/mofa/mofa_metadata_enrichment.pdf", width = 4.5, height = 4)
pheatmap(t(all_metadata_enrichment_top), show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315,display_numbers = T)Further, we can inspect the composition of the factors by plotting the top 10 weights per factor and view.
## Top 20 factor weights per view
grid.arrange(
### RNA
plot_top_weights(model,
view = "RNA",
factor = 4,
nfeatures = 10) +
ggtitle("RNA"),
### Proteomics
plot_top_weights(model,
view = "proteo",
factor = 4,
nfeatures = 10) +
ggtitle("Proteomics"),
### Metabolomics
plot_top_weights(model,
view = "metab",
factor = 4,
nfeatures = 10) +
ggtitle("Metabolomics"), ncol =3
)
Using this visualization, features with strong association with the factor (large absolute values) can be easily identified and further inspected by literature investigation.
Further tools to investigate the latent factors are available inside the MOFA framework (MOFA+: downstream analysis (in R)).
From MOFA output to TF activity, ligand-receptor activity
In the next step, using the weights of Factor 4 (highest shared R2 across views), different databases (liana and dorothea) and decoupleR, the transcription factor activities, ligand-receptor scores are estimated.
First, we have to extract the weights from our MOFA model and keep the weights from Factor 4 in the RNA view.
weights <- get_weights(model, views = "all", factors = "all")
save(weights, file = "results/mofa/mofa_weights.RData")
# Extract Factor with highest explained variance in RNA view
RNA <- data.frame(weights$RNA[,4])
row.names(RNA) <- gsub("_RNA","",row.names(RNA))Then we load the consensus networks from our databases, as well as the TF-targets regulons from collectri.
# Load LIANA (receptor and ligand) consensus network
# ligrec_ressource <- distinct(liana::decomplexify(liana::select_resource("Consensus")[[1]]))
# save(ligrec_ressource, file = "support/ligrec_ressource.RData")
#process the LR interaction prior knowledge to make suitable input for decoupleR
load(file = "support/ligrec_ressource.RData")
ligrec_geneset <- format_LR_ressource(ligrec_ressource)
# Load Dorothea (TF) network
# dorothea_df <- decoupleR::get_collectri()
# save(dorothea_df, file = "support/dorothea_df.RData")
load(file = "support/dorothea_df.RData")We can display what are the top weights of the model and to which factor they are associated.
RNA_all <- as.data.frame(weights$RNA)
row.names(RNA_all) <- gsub("_RNA","",row.names(RNA_all))
#Extract the top weights
RNA_top <- RNA_all[order(apply(RNA_all,1,function(x){max(abs(x))}), decreasing = T)[1:25],]
#plot them as heatmaps
palette <- make_heatmap_color_palette(RNA_top)
pheatmap(RNA_top, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315, filename = "results/mofa/mofa_top_RNA.pdf", width = 4, height = 4.3)
pheatmap(RNA_top, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315)We can do the same for metabolites
metabs_all <- as.data.frame(weights$metab)
row.names(metabs_all) <- gsub("_metab","",row.names(metabs_all))
#extract top metab weights
metabs_top <- metabs_all[order(apply(metabs_all,1,function(x){max(abs(x))}), decreasing = T)[1:10],]
#plot them as heatmaps
palette <- make_heatmap_color_palette(metabs_top)
pheatmap(metabs_top, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315, filename = "results/mofa/mofa_top_metabs.pdf", width = 4, height = 2.2)
pheatmap(metabs_top, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315)Then, by using decoupleR and prior knowledge networks, we calculate the different regulatory activities inferred by the ULM approach. Depending on the task, the minimum number of targets per source varies required to maintain the source in the output (e.g. two targets by definition for ligand-receptor interactions). Here can display them as heatmaps.
# Calculate regulatory activities from Receptor and Ligand network
ligrec_factors <- run_ulm(mat = as.matrix(RNA_all), network = ligrec_geneset, .source = set, .target = gene, minsize = 2)
ligrec_factors_df <- wide_ulm_res(ligrec_factors)
ligrec_factors_df <- ligrec_factors_df[order(apply(ligrec_factors_df,1,function(x){max(abs(x))}), decreasing = T)[1:25],]
#plot them as heatmaps
palette <- make_heatmap_color_palette(ligrec_factors_df)
pheatmap(ligrec_factors_df, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315, filename = "results/mofa/mofa_top_ligrec.pdf", width = 4, height = 4.3)
pheatmap(ligrec_factors_df, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315)
# Calculate regulatory activities from TF network
TF_factors <- run_ulm(mat = as.matrix(RNA_all), network = dorothea_df, minsize = 10)
TF_factors <- wide_ulm_res(TF_factors)
TF_factors <- TF_factors[order(apply(TF_factors,1,function(x){max(abs(x))}), decreasing = T)[1:25],]
#Plot them as heatmaps
palette <- make_heatmap_color_palette(TF_factors)
pheatmap(TF_factors, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315, filename = "results/mofa/mofa_top_TF.pdf", width = 4, height = 4.3)
pheatmap(TF_factors, show_rownames = T, cluster_cols = F, cluster_rows = F,color = palette, angle_col = 315)These activity estimations are saved in an input file for further downstream analysis as well.
# Calculate regulatory activities from Receptor and Ligand network
ligrec_high_vs_low <- run_ulm(mat = as.matrix(RNA), network = ligrec_geneset, .source = set, .target = gene, minsize = 2)
ligrec_high_vs_low <- ligrec_high_vs_low[ligrec_high_vs_low$statistic == "ulm",]
ligrec_high_vs_low_vector <- ligrec_high_vs_low$score
names(ligrec_high_vs_low_vector) <- ligrec_high_vs_low$source
ligrec_high_vs_low_top <- ligrec_high_vs_low[order(abs(ligrec_high_vs_low$score),decreasing = T)[1:15],c(2,4)]
ligrec_high_vs_low_top$source <- factor(ligrec_high_vs_low_top$source, levels = ligrec_high_vs_low_top$source)
ggplot(ligrec_high_vs_low_top, aes(x=source, y = score)) + geom_bar(stat= "identity",position = "dodge") + theme_minimal() + theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 315, vjust = 0.5, hjust=0))
# Calculate regulatory activities from TF network
TF_high_vs_low <- run_ulm(mat = as.matrix(RNA), network = dorothea_df, minsize = 10)
TF_high_vs_low <- TF_high_vs_low[TF_high_vs_low$statistic == "ulm",]
TF_high_vs_low_vector <- TF_high_vs_low$score
names(TF_high_vs_low_vector) <- TF_high_vs_low$source
# Prepare moon analysis input
TF_high_vs_low <- as.data.frame(TF_high_vs_low[,c(2,4)])
row.names(TF_high_vs_low) <- TF_high_vs_low[,1]
TF_high_vs_low_top_10 <- TF_high_vs_low[order(abs(TF_high_vs_low$score), decreasing = T)[1:10],]
TF_high_vs_low_top_10$source <- factor(TF_high_vs_low_top_10$source, levels = TF_high_vs_low_top_10$source)
ggplot(TF_high_vs_low_top_10, aes(x=source, y = score)) + geom_bar(stat= "identity",position = "dodge") + theme_minimal()
# Combine results
ligrec_TF_moon_inputs <- list("ligrec" = ligrec_high_vs_low_vector,
"TF" = TF_high_vs_low_vector)
save(ligrec_TF_moon_inputs, file = "data/cosmos/ligrec_TF_moon_inputs.Rdata")We have now successfully used the MOFA weights (Factor 4, RNA view) to infer not only TF activities but also the ligand-receptor interactions.
Extracting network with COSMOS to formulate mechanistic hypotheses
In this next parts the COSMOS run is going to be performed. We can use the output of decoupleR (the activities) next to the factor weights as an input for COSMOS to specifically focus the analysis on pre-computed data-driven results.
Here, in the first step, the data is loaded. Besides the activity estimations and the factor weights, the previous filtered out expressed gene names are loaded.
# Load data
load(file = "data/cosmos/ligrec_TF_moon_inputs.Rdata")
signaling_input <- ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$TF
ligrec_input <- ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$ligrec
RNA_input <- weights$RNA[,4]
prot_input <- weights$proteo[,4]
metab_inputs <- weights$metab[,4]
#remove MOFA tags from feature names
names(RNA_input) <- gsub("_RNA","",names(RNA_input))
names(prot_input) <- gsub("_proteo","",names(prot_input))
RNA_log2_FPKM <- as.data.frame(read_csv("data/RNA/RNA_log2_FPKM_clean.csv"))$Genes #since only complete cases were considered in the first part, here the full gene list is loadedWe can be interested in looking how RNA and corresponding proteins correlate in each factor. We can plot this using scatter plots for each factors.
weights_RNA <- as.data.frame(weights$RNA)
weights_prot <- as.data.frame(weights$proteo)
weights_prot$ID <- gsub("_proteo$","",row.names(weights_prot))
weights_RNA$ID <- gsub("_RNA$","",row.names(weights_RNA))
plot_list <- list()
r2_list <- list()
for(i in 1:(dim(weights_prot)[2]-1))
{
merged_weights <- merge(weights_RNA[,c(i,10)],weights_prot[,c(i,10)], by = "ID")
names(merged_weights) <- c("ID","RNA","prot")
r2_list[[i]] <- cor(merged_weights[,2],merged_weights[,3])^2
plot_list[[i]] <- ggplot(merged_weights,aes(x = RNA,y = prot)) + geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method='lm', formula= y~x) +
theme_minimal() +
theme(axis.title.x=element_blank(),
axis.text.x=element_blank(),
axis.ticks.x=element_blank(),
axis.title.y=element_blank(),
axis.text.y=element_blank(),
axis.ticks.y=element_blank())
}
r2_vec <- unlist(r2_list)
r2_vec
## [1] 0.041804090 0.411093174 0.038741311 0.421953345 0.002666596 0.291243355
## [7] 0.027585257 0.058177119 0.019215245
ggsave(filename = "results/mofa/RNA_prot_cor.pdf",plot = do.call("grid.arrange", c(plot_list, ncol = 3)), device = "pdf")
## Saving 7 x 7 in image
Coherently, only the factors where there is variance explained for both
RNA and proteins are correlated.
Next, we perform filtering steps in order to identify top deregulated features. Here, the individual filtering is based on absolute factor weight or activity score. The first step involves the visualization of the respective distribution to define an appropriate threshold.
First, the RNA factor weights are filtered based on a threshold defined by their distribution as well a threshold defined by the distribution of the protein factor weights.
##RNA
{plot(density(RNA_input))
abline(v = -0.2)
abline(v = 0.2)}
{plot(density(prot_input))
abline(v = -0.05)
abline(v = 0.05)}
Based on the plots and indicated by the straight lines, the RNA weights threshold is set to -0.2 and 0.2, and the protein weights threshold to -0.05 and 0.05. RNA factor weight values lying inside this threshold are set to 0 and previously filtered out genes (before MOFA analysis) are also included with value 0.
for(gene in names(RNA_input)) {
if (RNA_input[gene] > -0.2 & RNA_input[gene] < 0.2)
{
RNA_input[gene] <- 0
} else
{
RNA_input[gene] <- sign(RNA_input[gene]) * 10
}
if (gene %in% names(prot_input)) #will need to add a sign consistency check between RNA and prot as well
{
if (prot_input[gene] > -0.05 & prot_input[gene] < 0.05)
{
RNA_input[gene] <- 0
} else
{
RNA_input[gene] <- sign(RNA_input[gene]) * 10
}
}
}
RNA_log2_FPKM <- RNA_log2_FPKM[!(RNA_log2_FPKM %in% names(RNA_input))]
genes <- RNA_log2_FPKM
RNA_log2_FPKM <- rep(0,length(RNA_log2_FPKM))
names(RNA_log2_FPKM) <- genes
RNA_input <- c(RNA_input, RNA_log2_FPKM)The same procedure is repeated for the transcription factor activities.
## Transcription factors
{plot(density(signaling_input))
abline(v = -0.5)
abline(v = 3.5)}
The threshold is set to -0.5 and 3.5 respectively. Further, the TF_to_remove variable is later used to remove transcription factors with activities below this threshold from the prior knowledge network.
TF_to_remove <- signaling_input[signaling_input > -0.5 & signaling_input < 3.5]
signaling_input <- signaling_input[signaling_input < -0.5 | signaling_input > 3.5]The same procedure is repeated for the ligand-receptor activities.
## Ligand-receptor interactions
{plot(density(ligrec_input))
abline(v = -0.5)
abline(v = 2.5)}
Here, only activities higher than 2.5 or lower than -0.5 are kept (see straight lines in plot). This is an arbitrary theshold aimed at keeping a relativelly high number of interesting fetures to connect in the rest of the pipeline. Since at this point we are interested in the receptors, the names are adjusted accordingly and if there are multiple mentions of a receptor, its activity is calculated by the mean of the associated ligand-receptor interactions.
ligrec_input <- ligrec_input[ligrec_input > 2.5 | ligrec_input < -0.5]
rec_inputs <- ligrec_input
names(rec_inputs) <- gsub(".+___","",names(rec_inputs))
rec_inputs <- tapply(rec_inputs, names(rec_inputs), mean)
receptors <- names(rec_inputs)
rec_inputs <- as.numeric(rec_inputs)
names(rec_inputs) <- receptorsFinally, the same procedure is repeated for the metabolite factor weights.
## Metabolites
{plot(density(metab_inputs))
abline(v = -0.2)
abline(v = 0.2)}
The threshold is set to 0.2 and -0.2 respectively. Further, the metab_to_exclude variable is later used to remove metabolites with activities below this threshold from the prior knowledge network. Moreover, metabolite names are translated into HMDB format and metabolic compartment codes (m = mitochondria, c = cytosol) as well as metab__ prefix is added to HMDB IDs. More information regarding compartment codes can be found here.
metab_to_HMDB <- as.data.frame(
read_csv("data/metabolomic/MetaboliteToHMDB.csv"))
metab_to_HMDB <- metab_to_HMDB[metab_to_HMDB$common %in% names(metab_inputs),]
metab_inputs <- metab_inputs[metab_to_HMDB$common]
names(metab_inputs) <- metab_to_HMDB$HMDB
metab_inputs <- cosmosR::prepare_metab_inputs(metab_inputs, compartment_codes = c("m","c"))
metab_to_exclude <- metab_inputs[abs(metab_inputs) < 0.2]
metab_inputs <- metab_inputs[abs(metab_inputs) > 0.2]Next, the prior knowledge network (PKN) is loaded. To see how the full meta PKN was assembled, see PKN. Since we are not interested in including transcription factors and metabolites that were previously filtered out, we also remove the respective nodes from the PKN.
## Load and filter meta network
# data("meta_network")
# save(meta_network, file = "support/meta_network.RData")
load("support/meta_network.RData")
meta_network <- meta_network_cleanup(meta_network)
meta_network <- meta_network[!(meta_network$source %in% names(TF_to_remove))
& !(meta_network$target %in% names(TF_to_remove)),]
meta_network <- meta_network[!(meta_network$source %in% names(metab_to_exclude))
& !(meta_network$target %in% names(metab_to_exclude)),]Then the datasets are merged, entries that are not included in the PKN are removed and the filtering steps are completed. The merging in this case is based on the idea of deriving the forward network via the receptor to transcription factor/metabolite direction. We will perform first the first cosmos run between recptors and downstream TFs and metabolites. The second run will focus on connecting TFs awith downstream ligands.
Thus, we first define the upstream input as receptors, and the downstream input as TFs and metabolites. Since the scoring of the network is sensitive to the scale of the downstream measurments, we are multiplying the metabolite weights by 10 so that they are on a similar scale as the TF scores. Other scaling methods can be performed at the user’S discretion, this one is just a rough scaling, but good enough in this case.
# upstream_inputs <- c(rec_inputs)
# downstream_inputs <- c(metab_inputs*10, signaling_input)
#
# upstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(upstream_inputs, meta_network)
# downstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(downstream_inputs, meta_network)
#
# rec_to_TF_cosmos_input <- list(upstream_inputs_filtered, downstream_inputs_filtered)
# save(rec_to_TF_cosmos_input, file = "data/cosmos/rec_to_TF_cosmos_input.Rdata")MOON (meta footprint analysis)
In this part, we will run the network scoring to generate mechanistic hypotheses connecting ligands, receptors, TFs and metabolites, while pruning the network with information from both RNA and protein abundance to constrain the flux of signal consistent with the molecular data available.
In this approach, the network is compressed to avoid having redundant paths in the network leading to inflating the importance of some input measurements.
##filter expressed genes from PKN
# data("meta_network")
# save(meta_network, file = "support/meta_network.RData")
# load("support/meta_network.RData")
# meta_network <- meta_network_cleanup(meta_network)
expressed_genes <- as.data.frame(read_csv("data/RNA/RNA_log2_FPKM_clean.csv"))
## Rows: 11265 Columns: 61
## ── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## Delimiter: ","
## chr (1): Genes
## dbl (60): 786-0, A498, A549/ATCC, ACHN, BT-549, CAKI-1, CCRF-CEM, COLO 205, ...
##
## ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
expressed_genes <- setNames(rep(1,length(expressed_genes[,1])), expressed_genes$Genes)
meta_network_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_pkn_expressed_genes(names(expressed_genes), meta_pkn = meta_network)
## [1] "COSMOS: removing unexpressed nodes from PKN..."
## [1] "COSMOS: 14430 interactions removed"
##format metab inputs
metab_inputs <- as.numeric(scale(weights$metab[,4], center = F))
names(metab_inputs) <- row.names(weights$metab)
metab_to_HMDB <- as.data.frame(
read_csv("data/metabolomic/MetaboliteToHMDB.csv"))
## Rows: 139 Columns: 2
## ── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## Delimiter: ","
## chr (2): common, HMDB
##
## ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
## ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
metab_to_HMDB <- metab_to_HMDB[metab_to_HMDB$common %in% names(metab_inputs),]
metab_inputs <- metab_inputs[metab_to_HMDB$common]
names(metab_inputs) <- metab_to_HMDB$HMDB
metab_inputs <- cosmosR::prepare_metab_inputs(metab_inputs, compartment_codes = c("m","c"))
## [1] "Adding compartment codes."
#prepare upstream inputs
upstream_inputs <- c(rec_inputs) #the upstream input should be filtered for most significant
TF_inputs <- scale(ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$TF, center = F)
TF_inputs <- setNames(TF_inputs[,1], row.names(TF_inputs))
downstream_inputs <- c(metab_inputs, TF_inputs) #the downstream input should be complete
upstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(upstream_inputs, meta_network_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 5 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: BCAM, CD63, LRP10, NOTCH1, RXRA and 0 more."
downstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(downstream_inputs, meta_network_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 429 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: Metab__HMDB0011747_m, Metab__HMDB0000755_m, Metab__HMDB0001294_m, Metab__HMDB0001508_m, Metab__HMDB0000012_m, Metab__HMDB0001191_m and 423 more."
#Filter inputs and prune the meta_network to only keep nodes that can be found downstream of the inputs
#The number of step is quite flexible, 7 steps already covers most of the network
n_steps <- 6
# in this step we prune the network to keep only the relevant part between upstream and downstream nodes
meta_network_filtered <- cosmosR:::keep_controllable_neighbours(meta_network_filtered
, n_steps,
names(upstream_inputs_filtered))
## [1] "COSMOS: removing nodes that are not reachable from inputs within 6 steps"
## [1] "COSMOS: 29459 from 42695 interactions are removed from the PKN"
downstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(downstream_inputs_filtered, meta_network_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 28 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: Metab__HMDB0000168_m, Metab__HMDB0000056_m, Metab__HMDB0001051_m, Metab__HMDB0000139_m, Metab__HMDB0000687_m, Metab__HMDB0000696_m and 22 more."
meta_network_filtered <- cosmosR:::keep_observable_neighbours(meta_network_filtered, n_steps, names(downstream_inputs_filtered))
## [1] "COSMOS: removing nodes that are not observable by measurements within 6 steps"
## [1] "COSMOS: 6200 from 13236 interactions are removed from the PKN"
upstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(upstream_inputs_filtered, meta_network_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 4 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: EPHA6, GPC1, SDC1, SIRPA and 0 more."
write_csv(meta_network_filtered, file = "results/cosmos/moon/meta_network_filtered.csv")
#compress the network to avoid redundant master controllers
meta_network_compressed_list <- compress_same_children(meta_network_filtered, sig_input = upstream_inputs_filtered, metab_input = downstream_inputs_filtered)
meta_network_compressed <- meta_network_compressed_list$compressed_network
meta_network_compressed <- meta_network_cleanup(meta_network_compressed)
load(file = "support/dorothea_df.RData")
# RNA_input <- as.numeric(weights$RNA[,4])
# names(RNA_input) <- gsub("_RNA$","",row.names(weights$RNA))In this step, we format the MOFA weight and activity score information so that it can be appended to the moon network result afterward.
data("HMDB_mapper_vec")
## MOFA weights
MOFA_weights <- get_weights(model, factors = 4, as.data.frame = T)
MOFA_weights <- MOFA_weights %>%
arrange(feature, view) %>%
filter(!duplicated(feature))
MOFA_weights <- MOFA_weights[,c(1,3)]
colnames(MOFA_weights) <- c("Nodes", "mofa_weights")
#remove RNA and proteo tags and integrate values
MOFA_weights$Nodes <- gsub("_RNA$","",MOFA_weights$Nodes)
MOFA_weights$Nodes <- gsub("_proteo$","",MOFA_weights$Nodes)
MOFA_weights$sign <- sign(MOFA_weights$mofa_weights)
MOFA_weights$mofa_weights <- abs(MOFA_weights$mofa_weights)
MOFA_weights <- MOFA_weights %>% group_by(Nodes) %>% summarise_each(funs(max(., na.rm = TRUE)))
## Warning: `summarise_each()` was deprecated in dplyr 0.7.0.
## ℹ Please use `across()` instead.
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.
## Warning: `funs()` was deprecated in dplyr 0.8.0.
## ℹ Please use a list of either functions or lambdas:
##
## # Simple named list: list(mean = mean, median = median)
##
## # Auto named with `tibble::lst()`: tibble::lst(mean, median)
##
## # Using lambdas list(~ mean(., trim = .2), ~ median(., na.rm = TRUE))
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.
MOFA_weights <- as.data.frame(MOFA_weights)
MOFA_weights$mofa_weights <- MOFA_weights$mofa_weights * MOFA_weights$sign
MOFA_weights <- MOFA_weights[,-3]
#make metabolite names coherent between mofa and cosmos
#for now i just add the metab input that is already formatted
#I will miss some weights that were not input but will fix that at later time
MOFA_weights_metabaddon <- as.data.frame(metab_inputs)
names(MOFA_weights_metabaddon) <- "mofa_weights"
MOFA_weights_metabaddon$Nodes <- row.names(MOFA_weights_metabaddon)
MOFA_weights_metabaddon[, 2] <- sapply(MOFA_weights_metabaddon[, 2], function(x, HMDB_mapper_vec) {
x <- gsub("Metab__", "", x)
suffixe <- stringr::str_extract(x, "_[a-z]$")
x <- gsub("_[a-z]$", "", x)
if (x %in% names(HMDB_mapper_vec)) {
x <- HMDB_mapper_vec[x]
x <- paste("Metab__", x, sep = "")
}
if (!is.na(suffixe)) {
x <- paste(x, suffixe, sep = "")
}
return(x)
}, HMDB_mapper_vec = HMDB_mapper_vec)
MOFA_weights <- as.data.frame(rbind(MOFA_weights, MOFA_weights_metabaddon))
## Ligands
lig_weights <- ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$ligrec
names(lig_weights) <- gsub("___.+","",names(lig_weights))
lig_weights <- tapply(lig_weights, names(lig_weights), mean)
ligands <- names(lig_weights)
lig_weights <- as.numeric(lig_weights)
names(lig_weights) <- ligands
lig_weights <- data.frame(Nodes = names(lig_weights), feature_weights = lig_weights)
## Receptors
rec_weights <- ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$ligrec
names(rec_weights) <- gsub(".+___","",names(rec_weights))
rec_weights <- tapply(rec_weights, names(rec_weights), mean)
receptors <- names(rec_weights)
rec_weights <- as.numeric(rec_weights)
names(rec_weights) <- receptors
rec_weights <- data.frame(Nodes = names(rec_weights), feature_weights = rec_weights)
## TF
TF_weights <- ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$TF
names(TF_weights) <- gsub("_TF","",names(TF_weights))
TF_weights <- TF_weights[!(names(TF_weights) %in% c(rec_weights$Nodes,lig_weights$Nodes))]
TF_weights <- data.frame(Nodes = names(TF_weights), feature_weights = TF_weights)
## Combine
feature_weights <- as.data.frame(rbind(TF_weights, rec_weights, lig_weights))To also identify whether a node is a ligand or receptor we also load the liana consensus LR ressource.
# LIANA
load("support/ligrec_ressource.RData")
ligrec_df <- ligrec_ressource[,c("source_genesymbol","target_genesymbol")]
ligrec_df <- distinct(ligrec_df)
names(ligrec_df) <- c("Node1","Node2")
ligrec_df$Node1 <- gsub("-","_",ligrec_df$Node1)
ligrec_df$Node2 <- gsub("-","_",ligrec_df$Node2)
ligrec_df$Sign <- 1
ligrec_df$Weight <- 1In this step. we run the first moon analysis, to connect receptors with downstream TFs and ligands. MOON function is run iterativelly in a loop until the resulting scored network does not include edges incoherent with the RNA and proteomic data measurents. then, the network is decompressed, IDs are translated in a human-friendly format and a subnetowrk comparable to the classic cosmos solution network is generated with the reduce_solution_network function.
meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab <- meta_network_compressed
#We run moon in a loop until TF-target coherence convergences
before <- 1
after <- 0
i <- 1
while (before != after & i < 10) {
before <- length(meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab[,1])
start_time <- Sys.time()
moon_res <- cosmosR::moon(upstream_input = upstream_inputs_filtered,
downstream_input = downstream_inputs_filtered,
meta_network = meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab,
n_layers = n_steps,
statistic = "ulm")
meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab <- filter_incohrent_TF_target(moon_res, dorothea_df, meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab, RNA_input)
end_time <- Sys.time()
print(end_time - start_time)
after <- length(meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab[,1])
i <- i + 1
}
## [1] 2
## [1] 3
## [1] 4
## [1] 5
## [1] 6
## Time difference of 0.1765909 secs
## [1] 2
## [1] 3
## [1] 4
## [1] 5
## [1] 6
## Time difference of 0.2086551 secs
if(i < 10)
{
print(paste("Converged after ",paste(i-1," iterations", sep = ""),sep = ""))
} else
{
print(paste("Interupted after ",paste(i," iterations. Convergence uncertain.", sep = ""),sep = ""))
}
## [1] "Converged after 2 iterations"
moon_res <- decompress_moon_result(moon_res, meta_network_compressed_list, meta_network_rec_to_TFmetab)
#save the whole res for later
moon_res_rec_to_TFmet <- moon_res[,c(4,2,3)]
moon_res_rec_to_TFmet[,1] <- translate_column_HMDB(moon_res_rec_to_TFmet[,1], HMDB_mapper_vec)
levels <- moon_res[,c(4,3)]
moon_res <- moon_res[,c(4,2)]
names(moon_res)[1] <- "source"
plot(density(moon_res$score))
abline(v = 1)
abline(v = -1)
solution_network <- reduce_solution_network(decoupleRnival_res = moon_res,
meta_network = meta_network_filtered,
cutoff = 1.5,
upstream_input = upstream_inputs_filtered,
RNA_input = RNA_input,
n_steps = n_steps)
## [1] "COSMOS: removing nodes that are not reachable from inputs within 6 steps"
## [1] "COSMOS: 385 from 901 interactions are removed from the PKN"
SIF_rec_to_TFmetab <- solution_network$SIF
names(SIF_rec_to_TFmetab)[3] <- "sign"
ATT_rec_to_TFmetab <- solution_network$ATT
translated_res <- translate_res(SIF_rec_to_TFmetab,ATT_rec_to_TFmetab,HMDB_mapper_vec)
levels_translated <- translate_res(SIF_rec_to_TFmetab,levels,HMDB_mapper_vec)[[2]]
SIF_rec_to_TFmetab <- translated_res[[1]]
ATT_rec_to_TFmetab <- translated_res[[2]]
## Add weights to data
ATT_rec_to_TFmetab <- merge(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab, MOFA_weights, all.x = T)
ATT_rec_to_TFmetab <- merge(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab, feature_weights, all.x = T)
names(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab)[2] <- "AvgAct"
ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$NodeType <- ifelse(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$Nodes %in% levels_translated[levels_translated$level == 0,1],1,0)
ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$NodeType <- ifelse(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$Nodes %in% ligrec_df$Node1, 2, ifelse(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$Nodes %in% ligrec_df$Node2, 3, ifelse(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$Nodes %in% dorothea_df$source, 4, ATT_rec_to_TFmetab$NodeType)))
names(SIF_rec_to_TFmetab)[4] <- "Weight"
write_csv(SIF_rec_to_TFmetab,file = "results/cosmos/moon/SIF_rec_TFmetab.csv")
write_csv(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab,file = "results/cosmos/moon/ATT_rec_TFmetab.csv")Next, we also score a network connecting the TF with downstream ligands. The procedure is the same as the previous section, only the upstream and downstream input definition is changing.
##filter expressed genes from PKN
dorothea_PKN <- dorothea_df[,c(1,3,2)]
names(dorothea_PKN)[2] <- "interaction"
dorothea_PKN_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_pkn_expressed_genes(names(expressed_genes), meta_pkn = dorothea_PKN)
## [1] "COSMOS: removing unexpressed nodes from PKN..."
## [1] "COSMOS: 12053 interactions removed"
#prepare upstream inputs
#the upstream input should be filtered for most significant
upstream_inputs <- setNames(TF_weights$feature_weights, TF_weights$Nodes)
upstream_inputs <- upstream_inputs[abs(upstream_inputs) > 2]
lig_inputs <- ligrec_TF_moon_inputs$ligrec
names(lig_inputs) <- gsub("___.+","",names(lig_inputs))
lig_inputs <- tapply(lig_inputs, names(lig_inputs), mean)
ligands <- names(lig_inputs)
lig_inputs <- as.numeric(lig_inputs)
names(lig_inputs) <- ligands
lig_inputs <- scale(lig_inputs, center = F)
lig_inputs <- setNames(lig_inputs[,1], row.names(lig_inputs))
downstream_inputs <- lig_inputs #the downstream input should be complete
upstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(upstream_inputs, dorothea_PKN_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 22 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: SPI1, NR0B2, ESR1, AR, NKX2-5, RARB and 16 more."
downstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(downstream_inputs, dorothea_PKN_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 19 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: ACTR2, ADAM9, AGRN, ARPC5, EFNA3, EFNB1 and 13 more."
#Filter inputs and prune the meta_network to only keep nodes that can be found downstream of the inputs
#The number of step is quite flexible, 7 steps already covers most of the network
n_steps <- 1
# in this step we prune the network to keep only the relevant part between upstream and downstream nodes
dorothea_PKN_filtered <- cosmosR:::keep_controllable_neighbours(dorothea_PKN_filtered
, n_steps,
names(upstream_inputs_filtered))
## [1] "COSMOS: removing nodes that are not reachable from inputs within 1 steps"
## [1] "COSMOS: 1896 from 17542 interactions are removed from the PKN"
downstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(downstream_inputs_filtered, dorothea_PKN_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 9 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: BMP1, ETV5, GAS6, GDF11, ITGB3BP, MAML2 and 3 more."
dorothea_PKN_filtered <- cosmosR:::keep_observable_neighbours(dorothea_PKN_filtered, n_steps, names(downstream_inputs_filtered))
## [1] "COSMOS: removing nodes that are not observable by measurements within 1 steps"
## [1] "COSMOS: 12699 from 15646 interactions are removed from the PKN"
upstream_inputs_filtered <- cosmosR:::filter_input_nodes_not_in_pkn(upstream_inputs_filtered, dorothea_PKN_filtered)
## [1] "COSMOS: 7 input/measured nodes are not in PKN any more: MTF1, NR2C2, RBPJ, SRF, NCOA2, E2F2 and 1 more."
# load(file = "support/dorothea_df.RData")
# RNA_input <- as.numeric(weights$RNA[,4])
# names(RNA_input) <- gsub("_RNA$","",row.names(weights$RNA))
meta_network_TF_lig <- dorothea_PKN_filtered
write_csv(meta_network_TF_lig, file = "results/cosmos/moon/meta_network_TF_lig.csv")
before <- 1
after <- 0
i <- 1
while (before != after & i < 10) {
before <- length(meta_network_TF_lig[,1])
moon_res <- cosmosR::moon(upstream_input = upstream_inputs_filtered,
downstream_input = downstream_inputs_filtered,
meta_network = meta_network_TF_lig,
n_layers = n_steps,
statistic = "ulm")
meta_network_TF_lig <- filter_incohrent_TF_target(moon_res, dorothea_df, meta_network_TF_lig, RNA_input)
after <- length(meta_network_TF_lig[,1])
i <- i + 1
}
if(i < 10)
{
print(paste("Converged after ",paste(i-1," iterations", sep = ""),sep = ""))
} else
{
print(paste("Interupted after ",paste(i," iterations. Convergence uncertain.", sep = ""),sep = ""))
}
## [1] "Converged after 1 iterations"
moon_res_TF_lig <- moon_res
moon_res_TF_lig[,1] <- translate_column_HMDB(moon_res_TF_lig[,1], HMDB_mapper_vec)
levels <- moon_res[,c(1,3)]
moon_res <- moon_res[,c(1,2)]
names(moon_res)[1] <- "source"
plot(density(moon_res$score))
abline(v = 1)
abline(v = -1)
solution_network <- reduce_solution_network(decoupleRnival_res = moon_res,
meta_network = as.data.frame(dorothea_PKN_filtered[,c(1,3,2)]),
cutoff = 1.5,
upstream_input = upstream_inputs_filtered,
RNA_input = RNA_input,
n_steps = n_steps)
## [1] "COSMOS: removing nodes that are not reachable from inputs within 1 steps"
## [1] "COSMOS: 29 from 143 interactions are removed from the PKN"
SIF_TF_lig <- solution_network$SIF
names(SIF_TF_lig)[3] <- "sign"
ATT_TF_lig <- solution_network$ATT
translated_res <- translate_res(SIF_TF_lig,ATT_TF_lig,HMDB_mapper_vec)
levels_translated <- translate_res(SIF_TF_lig,levels,HMDB_mapper_vec)[[2]]
SIF_TF_lig <- translated_res[[1]]
ATT_TF_lig <- translated_res[[2]]
## Add weights to data
ATT_TF_lig <- merge(ATT_TF_lig, MOFA_weights, all.x = T)
ATT_TF_lig <- merge(ATT_TF_lig, feature_weights, all.x = T)
names(ATT_TF_lig)[2] <- "AvgAct"
ATT_TF_lig$NodeType <- ifelse(ATT_TF_lig$Nodes %in% levels_translated[levels_translated$level == 0,1],1,0)
ATT_TF_lig$NodeType <- ifelse(ATT_TF_lig$Nodes %in% ligrec_df$Node1, 2, ifelse(ATT_TF_lig$Nodes %in% ligrec_df$Node2, 3, ifelse(ATT_TF_lig$Nodes %in% dorothea_df$source, 4, ATT_TF_lig$NodeType)))
names(SIF_TF_lig)[4] <- "Weight"
write_csv(SIF_TF_lig,file = "results/cosmos/moon/SIF_TF_lig.csv")
write_csv(ATT_TF_lig,file = "results/cosmos/moon/ATT_TF_lig.csv")Both networks (Receptos -> TF and metabs; TF -> Ligands) are merged together into a single compbined scored network. We also add the conections between ligands and their corresponding receptors.
combined_SIF_moon <- as.data.frame(rbind(SIF_rec_to_TFmetab, SIF_TF_lig))
combined_SIF_moon <- unique(combined_SIF_moon)
combined_ATT_moon <- as.data.frame(rbind(ATT_rec_to_TFmetab, ATT_TF_lig))
combined_ATT_moon <- combined_ATT_moon %>% group_by(Nodes) %>% summarise_each(funs(mean(., na.rm = TRUE)))
## Warning: `summarise_each()` was deprecated in dplyr 0.7.0.
## ℹ Please use `across()` instead.
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.
## Warning: `funs()` was deprecated in dplyr 0.8.0.
## ℹ Please use a list of either functions or lambdas:
##
## # Simple named list: list(mean = mean, median = median)
##
## # Auto named with `tibble::lst()`: tibble::lst(mean, median)
##
## # Using lambdas list(~ mean(., trim = .2), ~ median(., na.rm = TRUE))
## Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
## generated.
combined_ATT_moon <- as.data.frame(combined_ATT_moon)
ligrec_ressource_addon <- ligrec_ressource[
ligrec_ressource$source_genesymbol %in% combined_SIF_moon$target &
ligrec_ressource$target_genesymbol %in% combined_SIF_moon$source
, c(10,12)]
ligrec_ressource_addon$sign <- 1
ligrec_ressource_addon$Weight <- 1
names(ligrec_ressource_addon)[c(1,2)] <- c("source","target")
ligrec_ressource_addon <- unique(ligrec_ressource_addon)
combined_SIF_moon <- as.data.frame(rbind(combined_SIF_moon, ligrec_ressource_addon))
#It appears I may need to only consider direct TF regulations for TF to lig
write_csv(combined_SIF_moon,file = "results/cosmos/moon/combined_SIF_moon.csv")
write_csv(combined_ATT_moon,file = "results/cosmos/moon/combined_ATT_moon.csv")
write_csv(moon_res_rec_to_TFmet, file = "results/cosmos/moon/moon_res_rec_to_TFmet.csv")
write_csv(moon_res_TF_lig, file = "results/cosmos/moon/moon_res_TF_lig.csv")Further analyses
Further MOFA-COSMOS downstream analyses focusing on analyzing network control structures and cell line specific MOFA transcriptomics are given in ./pathway_control_analysis_moon.Rmd and ./Cell_line_MOFA_space.Rmd
Session info
sessionInfo()
## R version 4.2.0 (2022-04-22)
## Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20 (64-bit)
## Running under: macOS Monterey 12.6
##
## Matrix products: default
## BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
## LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
##
## locale:
## [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
## [8] base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 gridExtra_2.3 pheatmap_1.0.12
## [4] ggfortify_0.4.15 ggplot2_3.4.0 tidyr_1.3.0
## [7] GSEABase_1.58.0 graph_1.74.0 annotate_1.74.0
## [10] XML_3.99-0.13 AnnotationDbi_1.58.0 IRanges_2.30.1
## [13] S4Vectors_0.34.0 Biobase_2.56.0 BiocGenerics_0.42.0
## [16] reshape2_1.4.4 dplyr_1.1.3 decoupleR_2.9.1
## [19] liana_0.1.5 MOFA2_1.6.0 cosmosR_1.5.2
## [22] readr_2.1.4
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] utf8_1.2.3 reticulate_1.28
## [3] tidyselect_1.2.0 RSQLite_2.2.20
## [5] htmlwidgets_1.6.1 grid_4.2.0
## [7] BiocParallel_1.30.4 Rtsne_0.16
## [9] devtools_2.4.5 munsell_0.5.0
## [11] ScaledMatrix_1.4.1 ragg_1.2.5
## [13] codetools_0.2-18 statmod_1.5.0
## [15] scran_1.24.1 future_1.30.0
## [17] miniUI_0.1.1.1 withr_2.5.0
## [19] colorspace_2.1-0 progressr_0.13.0
## [21] filelock_1.0.2 highr_0.10
## [23] logger_0.2.2 knitr_1.42
## [25] rstudioapi_0.14 SingleCellExperiment_1.18.1
## [27] listenv_0.9.0 labeling_0.4.2
## [29] MatrixGenerics_1.8.1 GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.8
## [31] farver_2.1.1 bit64_4.0.5
## [33] rhdf5_2.40.0 basilisk_1.8.1
## [35] parallelly_1.34.0 vctrs_0.6.1
## [37] generics_0.1.3 xfun_0.42
## [39] R6_2.5.1 doParallel_1.0.17
## [41] GenomeInfoDb_1.32.4 clue_0.3-63
## [43] rsvd_1.0.5 locfit_1.5-9.7
## [45] bitops_1.0-7 rhdf5filters_1.8.0
## [47] cachem_1.0.7 DelayedArray_0.22.0
## [49] vroom_1.6.1 promises_1.2.0.1
## [51] scales_1.2.1 gtable_0.3.1
## [53] beachmat_2.12.0 globals_0.16.2
## [55] processx_3.8.0 rlang_1.1.0
## [57] systemfonts_1.0.4 splines_4.2.0
## [59] GlobalOptions_0.1.2 checkmate_2.1.0
## [61] BiocManager_1.30.19 yaml_2.3.7
## [63] backports_1.4.1 httpuv_1.6.8
## [65] tools_4.2.0 usethis_2.1.6
## [67] ellipsis_0.3.2 sessioninfo_1.2.2
## [69] Rcpp_1.0.10 plyr_1.8.8
## [71] sparseMatrixStats_1.8.0 progress_1.2.2
## [73] zlibbioc_1.42.0 purrr_1.0.1
## [75] RCurl_1.98-1.10 ps_1.7.2
## [77] basilisk.utils_1.8.0 prettyunits_1.1.1
## [79] GetoptLong_1.0.5 cowplot_1.1.1
## [81] urlchecker_1.0.1 SeuratObject_4.1.3
## [83] SummarizedExperiment_1.26.1 ggrepel_0.9.2
## [85] cluster_2.1.4 fs_1.6.1
## [87] magrittr_2.0.3 circlize_0.4.15
## [89] matrixStats_0.63.0 pkgload_1.3.2
## [91] hms_1.1.3 mime_0.12
## [93] evaluate_0.20 xtable_1.8-4
## [95] readxl_1.4.2 shape_1.4.6
## [97] compiler_4.2.0 tibble_3.2.1
## [99] crayon_1.5.2 htmltools_0.5.5
## [101] mgcv_1.8-41 later_1.3.0
## [103] tzdb_0.3.0 DBI_1.1.3
## [105] corrplot_0.92 ComplexHeatmap_2.15.4
## [107] rappdirs_0.3.3 Matrix_1.5-3
## [109] cli_3.6.1 parallel_4.2.0
## [111] metapod_1.4.0 igraph_1.4.2
## [113] GenomicRanges_1.48.0 forcats_1.0.0
## [115] pkgconfig_2.0.3 dir.expiry_1.4.0
## [117] OmnipathR_3.9.6 sp_1.6-0
## [119] scuttle_1.6.3 xml2_1.3.3
## [121] foreach_1.5.2 dqrng_0.3.0
## [123] XVector_0.36.0 rvest_1.0.3
## [125] stringr_1.5.0 callr_3.7.3
## [127] digest_0.6.31 Biostrings_2.64.1
## [129] rmarkdown_2.21 cellranger_1.1.0
## [131] uwot_0.1.14 edgeR_3.38.4
## [133] DelayedMatrixStats_1.18.2 curl_5.0.0
## [135] shiny_1.7.4 rjson_0.2.21
## [137] nlme_3.1-161 lifecycle_1.0.3
## [139] jsonlite_1.8.4 Rhdf5lib_1.18.2
## [141] BiocNeighbors_1.14.0 limma_3.52.4
## [143] fansi_1.0.4 pillar_1.9.0
## [145] lattice_0.20-45 KEGGREST_1.36.3
## [147] fastmap_1.1.1 httr_1.4.5
## [149] pkgbuild_1.4.0 glue_1.6.2
## [151] remotes_2.4.2 png_0.1-8
## [153] iterators_1.0.14 bit_4.0.5
## [155] bluster_1.6.0 stringi_1.7.12
## [157] profvis_0.3.7 HDF5Array_1.24.2
## [159] blob_1.2.3 textshaping_0.3.6
## [161] BiocSingular_1.12.0 memoise_2.0.1
## [163] irlba_2.3.5.1 future.apply_1.10.0